
A Dog’s Prayer

Note: I haven’t seen this elsewhere on the internet so I don’t know who to cite as the source. This photo was forwarded to me by email with the text written below it. I used Photoshop to add the text into the image. If anyone knows where this originally came from, let me know so I can link to it!
Like This Post? Share It!
Like Awesomeology? Subscribe For Free!
|
|
Similar Posts You Might Like:
Trial Format Change For Awesomeology This Week | Awesome Stuff For Wednesday November 12 2008 | Ninja Cat | This Video Made My Day | Linkology For Friday October 3rd 2008 | Linkology For Friday October 17th 2008 | Linkology For Friday October 24th 2008 | Linkology For Friday October 10th 2008 | Man Kills Wife Over Facebook Status | Awesome Stuff For Tuesday November 4 2008 |








That’s a neat pic. The dog looks more earnest than the little boy. The caption wrecks the pic tho’, IMO. I looked around but had no luck either. Do you think it’s PhotoShopped? Tuff to tell but the paws do not imprint on the bed covers.
Brian
31 Oct 07 at 4:32 pm
I don’t know. If it is ’shopped, it’s a pretty good job! Looks real to me…
Awesomeology
31 Oct 07 at 5:29 pm
That’s a neat pic. The dog looks more earnest than the little boy. The caption wrecks the pic tho’, IMO. I looked around but had no luck either.
Do you think it’s PhotoShopped? Tuff to tell but the paws do not imprint on the bed covers.
31 Oct 07 at 8:32 pm
I don’t know. If it is ’shopped, it’s a pretty good job! Looks real to me…
31 Oct 07 at 9:29 pm
I did a google search for this pic and it’s seems to be everywhere…http://www.google.com/search?q=dear+lord+thank+yo... :-\
JT
4 Nov 07 at 5:16 pm
Wow…you’re right, I’m an idiot! I did a Google Image Search and didn’t find it…probably should have done the normal search. But I still have the same problem…no idea who the original source is.
Awesomeology
4 Nov 07 at 6:06 pm
It’s the toughest job to keep track of ‘attribution’ and ‘copyright’ and bloggers get too much of the flack. For example, I’ve spent maybe two dozen hours looking for the original source of a popular photo of a http://brianhayes.com/2007/04/st-bernard-and-chic...rel=”nofollow”>dog and fawn that has a dozen different explanations, but maybe no true owner of publishing rights. Things might evolve to make it easier, but these days it’s rough. So the last thing on my mind is to be hassling a good blog author. When rights and copyrights were first introduced, the judges were taught that it was important for an owner to say so. I repeat, if there isn’t a sign on the tree, or a fence, or a mark on the picture, how does the public learn that it’s private property? Judges were cautious about giving somebody rights to a parcel of land if the owner didn’t “post a claim”. There’s a lot of stuff on the web that has nothing that says it belongs to anybody. There’s no way to nail a sign on a tree or put up a barbed wire fence. In the long run, I think that it’s the owner’s job to “mark” his property, but the web hasn’t discovered a way to do it.
Brian
4 Nov 07 at 8:55 pm
I did a google search for this pic and it’s seems to be everywhere…http://www.google.com/search?q=dear+lord+thank+you+for+bringing+me+to+Timmy%27s+house&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
:-\
4 Nov 07 at 9:16 pm
Wow…you’re right, I’m an idiot! I did a Google Image Search and didn’t find it…probably should have done the normal search.
But I still have the same problem…no idea who the original source is.
4 Nov 07 at 10:06 pm
It’s the toughest job to keep track of ‘attribution’ and ‘copyright’ and bloggers get too much of the flack.
For example, I’ve spent maybe two dozen hours looking for the original source of a popular photo of a dog and fawn that has a dozen different explanations, but maybe no true owner of publishing rights.
Things might evolve to make it easier, but these days it’s rough. So the last thing on my mind is to be hassling a good blog author.
When rights and copyrights were first introduced, the judges were taught that it was important for an owner to say so. I repeat, if there isn’t a sign on the tree, or a fence, or a mark on the picture, how does the public learn that it’s private property? Judges were cautious about giving somebody rights to a parcel of land if the owner didn’t “post a claim”.
There’s a lot of stuff on the web that has nothing that says it belongs to anybody. There’s no way to nail a sign on a tree or put up a barbed wire fence.
In the long run, I think that it’s the owner’s job to “mark” his property, but the web hasn’t discovered a way to do it.
5 Nov 07 at 12:55 am
as far as i know it comes from dumpalink.com thats where i saw it
roadkill
4 Dec 07 at 10:21 am